Start Now or Regret Later: Legal Mistakes That Can Cripple Your Startup

A young woman stands against a green metal wall, holding a tablet in one hand while touching her forehead with the other. Her eyes are closed and her expression is tense, suggesting stress or concern over something she’s reading.

1. The Rush to Launch, The Price to Pay

When I first met the founders of a promising Kenyan SaaS (Software as a Service) startup, they were on a high. Their platform had gained real traction, they’d onboarded a few early clients and they had just been shortlisted for a regional accelerator.

“We’re moving fast,”

one of them told me proudly.

“We’ll handle the legal stuff once money comes in.”

Then came the investor due diligence.

Three startup founders sit around a table in a modern office, reviewing a document labeled “Investor Due Diligence” with visible red annotations. One founder holds his head in frustration, another looks on seriously, while a third points at the document during a video call with a suited legal advisor displayed on a laptop.

Within 48 hours, the accelerator flagged five red flags:

  • Their business name wasn’t registered and someone else had just reserved a similar one.
  • They had no signed founder agreements, despite one co-founder having already left quietly.
  • Their privacy policy didn’t match their actual data handling, putting them at odds with Kenya’s Data Protection Act.  
  • Their main client contract had no jurisdiction clause and there was confusion about how to go about enforcement.
  • They had zero IP protection for the software, which had been built by a freelance developer who was never formally contracted.

The client they were most proud of, a mid-sized telecom company, backed out of the renewal, citing

“legal exposure.”

The investor deferred their decision. The co-founder who’d left demanded equity, verbally promised, never documented.

That’s when they walked into our office.

We didn’t start with a pitch deck. We started with a diagnosis, the business was growing on top of legal quicksand.

2. No Paper, No Protection

Like most startups, the founders assumed that legal formalities could wait until they were

“worth something.”

They had split equity with a handshake. One co-founder handled the product, another managed clients and the third was mostly absent but still “part of the team.” Their agreement? A few WhatsApp messages, one Excel sheet and some emails with hopeful percentages. No shareholder agreement. No vesting terms. No clarity on decision-making in case of conflict, death or exit.

Then things got serious.

A prospective investor asked for their cap table. They sent a Google Doc.

Next question,

“Who owns the IP?”

No one had an answer. The software had been built before the company was registered.

Three diverse startup founders sit at a conference table in a modern office. One looks concerned while holding a blank clipboard, another stares intently at a laptop, and the third rests his head on his hand, all surrounded by unorganized documents—conveying uncertainty and lack of legal clarity.

Final straw, a disgruntled ex-contributor surfaced with screenshots showing they’d been promised 10%. He was now threatening to sue.

The investor walked.

What most founders don’t realize is that without paper, there is no protection. Kenya’s Companies Act allows for flexibility in shareholder structures but without a formal Shareholders’ Agreement, everything falls back to the default legal provisions. Which rarely favour startups.

Investor-friendly terms like vesting schedules, tag-along rights, founder lock-ins or dispute resolution clauses aren’t

“nice to have”,

they’re basic infrastructure.

The founders weren’t the first to learn that the hard way. They just happened to learn fast enough to survive it.

3. Your Code Isn’t Yours (And Neither is the Brand)

Still with the SaaS startup as they were preparing for a funding round when a simple question stalled everything:

“Can you confirm ownership of your tech stack and brand assets?”

The truth? They couldn’t.

Their platform had been built by a freelance developer they met through Twitter. No formal contract. No IP assignment. Just a chain of M-PESA payments and a few friendly emails. The logo? Created by a design student in exchange for

“exposure”

nothing signed, no terms agreed.

Three professionals sit at a conference table in a modern office. A woman in the foreground looks frustrated while reading a document with a large registered trademark symbol. Two male colleagues beside her appear concerned and contemplative, reflecting tension over brand ownership issues.

When the investor’s due diligence team dug deeper, the red flags multiplied:

     i.         The developer hadn’t transferred any rights. Legally, he owned the code.

   ii.         The brand materials were copyrighted to the designer by default.

  iii.         No NDA had been signed, meaning trade secrets were completely unprotected.

In Kenyan law, unless explicitly assigned in writing, intellectual property created by independent contractors belongs to the creator, not the client. That means your app, your logo, your UI/UX… could legally be someone else’s.

The startup didn’t just risk embarrassment, they risked being locked out of their own product.

This is more common than founders admit. In the early days, people prioritize speed over structure. But when things work, when traction comes or funding becomes possible, the IP chaos surfaces. And it can kill momentum instantly.

Today, that startup has enforceable NDAs, signed IP transfer agreements and clear internal IP ownership policies. But they had to backtrack and rebuild what should’ve been handled on day one.

4. Casual Staff. Costly Claims

One of our clients, a tech-enabled logistics startup, thought they were playing it smart. They’d onboarded junior staff as

“interns”

to save on payroll costs, with no formal contracts and verbal promises of stipends or future employment.

Three professionals sit at a conference table discussing a document labeled “Employment Contract.” The man on the right gestures emphatically while holding the contract, the man in the center examines it seriously, and the woman on the left looks skeptical, arms crossed—conveying tension around employment terms and potential disputes.

One of those interns handled sensitive customer data. Another worked full-time hours managing dispatch. Neither had a written agreement. When business slowed, the team decided to

“let them go.”

Two months later, a demand letter arrived from a law firm. One of the interns had filed a complaint at the Employment and Labour Relations Court claiming unfair termination, underpayment and misclassification.

The startup’s defence?

“We hadn’t formalized anything. It wasn’t that serious.”

The court disagreed.

In Kenyan labour law, the label you give a worker doesn’t matter, their actual duties and working conditions do. If someone works under your control, on a regular basis and contributes to your business, the law likely considers them an employee, with rights.

That includes:

     i.         Notice before termination

   ii.         Statutory deductions (NSSF, NHIF, PAYE)

  iii.         Leave entitlements

  iv.         Protection against unfair dismissal

The startup had no written contracts, no clear HR policy and no documentation to support their decision. They settled expensively.

What felt like a harmless cost-saving move turned into reputational damage, cash outflows and an internal culture breakdown.

Casual doesn’t mean exempt.

Kenya’s employment laws are designed to protect the most vulnerable. And in court, the burden is on the employer to show structure not assumptions.

5. Contracts You Don’t Understand or Haven’t Read

We once reviewed a startup’s main service agreement, the very contract they’d been using with all their clients. It looked polished. It had a table of contents, digital signature fields and neat formatting. But there were two problems:

i.      The contract was downloaded from a U.S. legal website, and governed by the laws of Delaware.

ii.    It had no liability clause, no dispute resolution mechanism and no mention of data protection.

They hadn’t negotiated it. They hadn’t reviewed it with counsel. They’d just… filled in the names.

The client had already signed it.

Three professionals sit at a conference table in a well-lit office. The man in the center holds a contract and looks confused, while the woman beside him massages her temple in frustration and the older man on the other side watches with concern, highlighting the stress of unclear or unread agreements.

In Kenya, this kind of oversight isn’t just risky, it’s reckless.

Using a contract you don’t fully understand exposes your business in four key ways:

  • Wrong jurisdiction. If a dispute arises, your contract could force you to resolve it in a foreign court or worse, leave you with no enforceable remedy at all.
  • No liability caps or indemnity clauses. If something goes wrong, delayed service, system outage, data breach, you could be on the hook for losses far beyond what you were paid.
  • No data protection safeguards. With Kenya’s Data Protection Act now in full force any service agreement involving customer or employee data must reflect actual processing practices. If not, the contract could violate the law by default.
  • One-sided terms you didn’t catch. Many templates, especially foreign ones, favour the other party. Without review, you could be signing away rights you didn’t mean to give up.

Startups often see contract review as a luxury. But most legal disasters aren’t caused by bad people, they’re caused by bad documents.

If you don’t know what your contract protects you from, it probably doesn’t!

6. Investors Look at Revenue and Audit Your Risk

Founders often assume that traction is enough, that if the product works and the numbers look good, investment will follow. But seasoned investors aren’t just betting on potential. They’re assessing risk.

Three professionals sit at a conference table analyzing a “Risk Assessment” document. The man in the center reads the paper intently, while the two colleagues beside him appear focused and serious. Financial charts and data are visible on printed sheets and a screen behind them, reflecting investor-style due diligence.

When we support startups preparing for due diligence, the questions that come up aren’t always about the product or growth metrics. They’re legal, structural and strategic:

  • Are your shares clean? Can you show exactly who owns what, with signed shareholder agreements, cap tables and no unresolved claims from ex-team members?
  • Is your team legally tied in? Are there enforceable contracts with key staff, including IP clauses, NDAs and clear terms of engagement?
  • Do you have a paper trail for your business operations? Tax compliance, contract records, board resolutions, licensing, data protection, if you’ve grown on verbal agreements and assumptions, it shows.

Investors aren’t looking for perfection. But they do need predictability. They want to know that once their money lands, it won’t get trapped in a legal mess, a staff dispute or a silent IP war with a former contractor.

The fastest way to raise doubt in an investor’s mind? Unclear ownership, missing contracts, and a founder who says,

“We’ll sort it later.”

Startups that scale have more than good ideas, they have good structure. And it shows before the pitch ends.

7. What Legal Hygiene Actually Looks Like for Startups

There’s no glamour in legal hygiene but it’s what separates fundable businesses from risky bets.

You don’t need fancy structures or a full-time legal team. You need the right foundations, locked in early and aligned with how you actually operate.

Two professionals at a table discussing.

Here’s what that looks like in real terms:

  • Shareholding clarity. A signed shareholder agreement that spells out ownership, decision-making, exits and dilution. No guesswork, no handshake equity.
  • IP that belongs to the business. Clear IP assignments from developers, designers and consultants, with supporting NDAs and enforceable transfer clauses.
  • Contracts that reflect your reality. Vendor, customer and partnership agreements tailored to Kenyan law, not foreign templates with irrelevant jurisdictions and silent liability.
  • Employees legally engaged. Written contracts for everyone on the team. Role clarity. Termination structures. Statutory compliance for NSSF, NHIF, PAYE and leave entitlements.
  • Data privacy locked in. A real privacy policy (not a placeholder), clear consent mechanisms and a basic understanding of what you collect, where you store it and who has access.

You don’t need to fix it all at once. But you do need to start before investors force you to, or a dispute exposes the cracks.

Startups don’t get sued for being new. They get sued for being sloppy. Clean structure isn’t a bonus. It’s your base.

Takeaway: You Can’t Scale What Isn’t Solid

Most startups don’t fail because the idea was wrong. They fail because the foundation was weak.

Legal isn’t just paperwork, it’s the infrastructure behind trust, protection and long-term growth. It’s what gives your co-founder peace of mind, your investors confidence and your clients the assurance that you’re built to last.

The earlier you fix it, the cheaper and cleaner it is.

By the time it becomes a crisis, you’ve already lost time, leverage or money.

Don’t build on sand. Build something that can scale and stand.

At Broline & Associates, we help founders build startups that stand and can withstand scrutiny.

Broline Ogombe
Founding Partner & Head of Strategy
Follow us on social media:
Logo icon
Blog

Stay Updated with Legal Trends

Stay ahead in the legal world with our regular updates and expert analysis on current legal developments. Whether you're navigating regulatory changes or handling legal disputes, we've got you covered.

Ready to brief us or make an inquiry?

Work with Broline & Associates to structure smart solutions and deliver outcomes that matter.

Project Image